🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is pursuing compensation totaling $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This move represents a clear response by the Kremlin regarding plans to use immobilized Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to accounts in local news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

EU leaders are set to determine later this week on a plan to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and financial stability.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the primary keeper for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

EU officials have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any utilization of the funds as theft. Authorities have warned of reciprocal measures, including confiscating European corporate assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a prominent role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

With statements seen as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious attack on property rights and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the latest legal action. The institution has previously noted it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in EU countries are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if relevant holdings can be identified," stated a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials said they are developing measures to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against European entities. Additionally, they are designing safeguards to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the detailed plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would only be obligated to return the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay reparations for the vast destruction caused during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different approach for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, demands full agreement among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful message that if you cause all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."